WebDifferent versions of the ought-implies-can principle correspond to different ways of using the terms 'ought', 'can', and 'implies'. So to formulate precisely OIC, namely the version of the principle that I defend, I need to explain how I use these terms. (1) I understand the claim that an agent ought to do some- Web14 hours ago · Advertisement. “De Humani Corporis Fabrica”—the Latin title means “On the Fabric of the Human Body”—is not as groundbreaking a picture. But it is a compelling and possibly important one. Not so much because of what it shows, although what it shows can rightly be described as shocking and galvanic. (By the same token, it occurred to ...
如何将「Ass we can」翻译得信达雅? - 知乎
WebDec 19, 2014 · 知乎,中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台,于 2011 年 1 月正式上线,以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解,找到自己的解答」为品牌使 … WebJun 11, 2024 · A standard principle in ethics is that moral obligation entails ability, or that “ought implies can”. A strong case has been made that this principle is not well motivated in moral psychology. This paper presents an analogous case against the theoretical motivation for the principle. The principle is in tension with several foundational areas of ethical … income tax on bonus pay
Ought Implies Can - Bibliography - PhilPapers
Webought implies can, in ethics, the principle according to which an agent has a moral obligation to perform a certain action only if it is possible for him or her to perform it. In other words, … WebCharles Pigden considers Hume’s famous claim that you can’t deduce an ‘ought’ from an ‘is’. According to David Hume, his Treatise of Human Nature “fell dead-born from the press, without reaching such distinction, as even to excite a murmur among the zealots.”. Since Hume’s day his still-born baby has undergone a mighty ... Web'ought' implies 'can'. (We obtain the conclusion by a reductio ad absurdum: from the given premise and the further hypothesis that A ought to do x, we obtain a contradiction, namely that A can and cannot do x, on the strength of which we assert the negation of that hypothesis.) But again this rule of inference has income tax on benefits